if people want to take out tanks, they should build a turret. Right now the guard tower hits as strong as a tank shell, roughly.
Reducing advanced tower's damage vs. infantry. Its focus should be more on vehicles. It still is ok vs. infantry with spread of 6, but not supposed to be infantry killer, per se.
Increasing inaccuracy slightly. (3 -> 5)
-reducing turretgun vs. infantry slightly
It's really difficult to kill guard towers once they're up. The only reliable ways are to try to take out their power with airstrikes/orcas/etc. or use artillery from a distance. They are supposed to be tough but they are a bit too much.
Guard tower HP should be nerfed because they are wickedly hard to kill. Adv. tower's power should increase because they are annoying when sprawled everywhere and really hard to take out once established.
Nerfed sniper earlier from 7 -> 5.5. But since decimals dont mean jack in ORA, it's 5.
Since the sniper does cost 10x as much as infantry, and is a top tier unit, it should have some advantage with its sniper rifle in range to be useful on the battlefield. 5 just isn't enough.
Seems like taking cover is a liability much more than a protection. I think it's better if infantry get out of the way of artillery rather than slow down and stay in its way. It's frustrating watching your infantry die pointlessly.
Instead of this, a reasonable alternative might be to double-click orders for your infantry to force them back up.
For some reason artillery wasn't exploding. I had set it at 75% odds last time I edited it. Just making it explode again.
It really needs to explode. It only costs $600 and is pretty powerful. This is its drawback, to make it vulnerable if player bunches them up.
Nobody uses repair bay, because it's not a pre-requisite for anything, and it's expensive. Reducing cost from $1200 to $600.
To compensate for its lower value, its HP are being lowered as well, from 800 to 400. Now it should be killable with an airstrike, which is about right.
To anyone paying attention: there has been some discussion over whether repairs should be cheaper. I am agnostic on the issue for now. How about we see if people like the repair bay more now and consider using it, before making further balance changes? Open to discussion.
Chinook had "Re-arms at: HPAD" entered in its rules, even though it has no weapons. This is what caused it to return to base when you hit 'F' instead of land.
Now it lands again when you hit F. *phew* so happy :)
Sniper range of 7 seems ridiculous, since it's a one-shot kill, and you can build multiple. (I support building multiple). Surprised I never noticed this issue before.
The range in C&C 95 was 5.5.
The ScanRadius is set to 5, which is probably why we haven't noticed any OP problems.
It's also a bit ridiculous since the unit's sight radius is only 5.
Making bridges indestructible.
Rationale:
-many maps don't work when bridges are destructible (most or all of the crossings are bridges)
-bridges will be repairable in the future. At this point, an engi can come and re-open it, but in the meantime, they shouldn't be destroyed.
-if someone wants to make a map with destructible bridges, they still can, by editing the .yaml themselves. This should be the default, though.
(FWIW, bridges were not destructible in C&C 1.)
Mobile SAM launcher name shortened.
Stealth tank time increased 80 -> 90 until https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/issues/2898 is addressed.
Shortened a few other names.
Fixed some descriptions.
